Patrick v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
323 F.3d 592 · 2003
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
August 2009
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Roth v. Shalala · Beckley v. Apfel · Reynolds v. Chater · Hildebrand v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the Commissioner's decision to deny Social Security benefits to determine if the decision is supported by substantial evidence on the whole record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barnett v. Barnhart“In undertaking this analysis, our court `should neither consider a claim de novo, nor abdicate its function to carefully analyze the entire record.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barnett v. Barnhart“Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but enough that a reasonable mind might accept it as adequate to support a decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barnett v. Barnhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.