Hill’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2024
2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee · Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland · McDonald v. Kinder-Morgan, Inc. · U.S. West Inc. v. Tristani
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any other issues which need[ed] to be resolved” or if it had "missed an objection that [Mr. Magallon-Mal-danado] ha[d] made.” R., Vol. II, at 30. Counsel for Mr. Magallon-Maldanado did not bring up the senteneing-disparity issue at this point, or at any subsequent juncture in the proceedings. 4 . Given the district court's comments at sentencing about reading and digesting the arguments in Mr. Magallon-Maldanado’s Sentencing Memorandum, we are willing to assume (without deciding) that Mr. Magallon-Malda-nado did adequately preserve the senteneing-disparity argument made in his memorandum, despite the court’s decision to strike that memorandum as untimely. However, this assumption offers Mr. Magallon-Maldanado no succor because, as explicated infra, the sentencing-disparity argument in his Sentencing Memorandum is not the same one that is before us on appeal. 5 . Mr. Magallon-Maldanado’s reference to precedent from one of our sister circuits in no way persuades us to alter our view of his circumstances. "Even if we were bound by opinions handed down in other circuits, which we are not, we would agree with the district court....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““ ‘there was no change made or sought to tariffs and there was no increase or decrease ordered or sought in the rates that the defendants charge their customers.... There was merely a mechanism established outside the rates and tariffs to eredit[ ] select low income customers’ bills [ie., rather than refund the money to all customers].... The rates for utility service were not modified at all.’””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“unless a plaintiff's challenge is to an 'order affecting rates'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.