United States v. Manafort’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 22 U.S.C. § 611 (Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938) · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 31 U.S.C. § 5314 · 52 U.S.C. § 30121
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Spinelli v. United States · Andresen v. Maryland · Maryland v. Garrison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence relevant to establish a defendant's state of mind at the time he allegedly committed fraud-related crimes ... can often come from records and evidence separate from, and unrelated to, the allegedly criminal transactions themselves.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[p]roperty, records, or information related to the state of mind and/or motive of [the defendant and his brother] to undertake the Boston Marathon bombings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“courts have rejected challenges to warrants that ... broadly authorize seizure of evidence related to a defendant's state of mind.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.