Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 323 GAAPP 614 - Darst v. State

Darst v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Robinson v. State · Schofield v. Holsey · Garza v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a defendant establishes that trial counsel's performance was deficient in more than one respect, the court's determination of whether he or she was prejudiced thereby requires consideration of the collective effect of the deficiencies. The combined effects of counsel's errors should be considered together as one issue with regard to the prejudice test. It is the prejudice arising from counsel's errors that is constitutionally relevant, so each individual error by counsel should not be considered in a vacuum.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Because due process requires the existence of sufficient evidence as to every element of the crime of which a defendant is convicted, the fact that this issue was not explicitly raised does not prevent us from addressing (nor, more importantly, does it justify a refusal to address) the issue at this juncture.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.