Pruitt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Suggs v. State · Towry v. State · 274 Ga. App. 704 - Currid v. DeKalb State Court Probation Department · 296 Ga. App. 795 - Daniels v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]ur requirements for appellate briefs were created not to provide an obstacle, but to aid parties in presenting arguments in a manner most likely to be fully and efficiently comprehended by this Court; a party will not be granted relief should we err in deciphering a brief which fails to adhere to the required form. 11”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Because [Coleman’s] motion was based on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the trial court was required to apply the two-pronged test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668 ( 104 SCt 2052 , 80 LE2d 674) (1984), to determine whether counsel’s performance was deficient, and, if so, whether [Coleman] was prejudiced by the deficiency”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.