Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 323 Mo. 200 - Meyer v. Kansas City

Meyer v. Kansas City’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
July 2000
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2000

17 state decisions

60192919301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex inf. Harvey v. Missouri Athletic Club · State ex rel. Roland v. Dreyer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The proposition submitted to the voters] contains no grant of power, other than that clearly comprehended within the words employed. There is no room, therefore, for the application of the doctrine of implied powers. This is especially true of a grant of powers to a corporation, municipal or otherwise, and if any doubt arises out of the use of the words employed, it is to be resolved in favor of the public and in limiting the expenditures of the appropriation to the express terms for which it was made.... Another general rule in the construction of statutes, applicable as well to municipal ordinances, is that acts of the character here under review are to be strictly construed. (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “for the construction, improvement and equipment of municipal docks and wharves.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.