Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 323 N.C. 455 - State v. Rose

State v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

86 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Hajmm Co. v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc. (1991), State v. Jennings (1993)

86 state decisions

6001988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Earnhardt · State v. Smith · State v. Weeks · State v. Britt · State v. Misenheimer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Assuming, arguendo, that the answer was apparent from the context within which the question was asked and that it would have been Dr. Royal's opinion that defendant could not have premeditated or deliberated the killings, such testimony would have been inadmissible as a conclusion that a legal standard had not been met.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “; testimony embraced precise legal terms, definitions of which are not readily apparent to medical experts); State v. Ledford, 315 N.C. 599, 617-21 , 340 S.E.2d 309, 320-22 (1986) (medical expert could not testify that injuries were the”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “as to whether or not defendant `under his state of mind' at the time of the killings could have `premeditated or planned or deliberated' them.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.