State v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · Washington v. Davis · Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. Feeney · Romer Governor of Colorado v. Evans · Guin v. Ha
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Marriage Amendment does not explicitly or implicitly prohibit the State from offering the same property tax exemption to an eligible applicant who has a same-sex domestic partner that the State offers to an eligible applicant who has a spouse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“real property owned and occupied as the primary residence and permanent place of abode by a resident who is ... 65 years of age or older ... is exempt from taxation on the first $ 150,000 of the assessed value of the real property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“At the low end of the sliding seale, we have held that a substantial relationship between means and ends is constitutionally adequate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.