Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 323 SO2D 160 - Etheridge v. Doughty

Etheridge v. Doughty’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1976
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Thompson v. State · 266 So. 2d 549 - Cooper v. Broussard · Cooper v. Broussard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the action of the committee in compiling and tabulating the results of the election and certifying and declaring the result thereof that Moseley was the Democratic nominee for the Judge of Division ‘K’ is not an official promulgation, then there is no statutory method prescribed for promulgation of the returns and the result of a primary election. This analysis would effectuate an untoward and impractical result and would make it cumbersome and almost impossible to determine the time of promulgation by the committee.” 266 So.2d 552”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.