Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 323 SW3D 715 - Paulley v. Commonwealth

Paulley v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · United States v. Wood · Commonwealth v. Benham · Bowling v. Commonwealth · Stopher v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]ar more troubling is the fact that prospective juror ... was unable to disclaim any bias.... In fact, she stated she might not be able to put out of her mind the fact that her son was a victim of an armed robbery. When asked directly whether she could be fair and impartial, the juror stated she was not sure. [[Image here]] The last word on this crucial subject was the juror’s honest-seeming expression of doubt about her ability to be fair and impartial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.