Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 323 SW3D 893 - Brooks v. State

Brooks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

530
cited by 530 later decisions
1
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

529 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco))

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · In Re King's Estate · Tibbs v. Florida · City of Keller v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 530 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to fairly resolve conflicts in testimony, to weigh the evidence, and to draw reasonable inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[A] reviewing court is required to defer to the jury's credibility and weight determinations because the jury is the sole judge of the witnesses' credibility and the weight to be given their testimony.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.