Brooks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
529 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco))
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · In Re King's Estate · Tibbs v. Florida · City of Keller v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 530 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to fairly resolve conflicts in testimony, to weigh the evidence, and to draw reasonable inferences from basic facts to ultimate facts.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Reed v. State · Briscoe v. State“[A] reviewing court is required to defer to the jury's credibility and weight determinations because the jury is the sole judge of the witnesses' credibility and the weight to be given their testimony.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.