Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 323 U.S. 459 - Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury

Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury’s Empirical Analysis

323 U.S. 459 · 1945

Citation profile

3,410
cited by 3,410 later decisions
106
cited 106 times by the Supreme Court
31
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

1,006 federal appellate · 556 district · 189 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3,410 later decisions (106 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably Scheuer v. Rhodes (1974), Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle (1977)

1,006 federal appellate · 556 district · 189 state decisions — followed in 31 states

9690194519501960197019801990200020102020decidedoverruled

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. A case is still cited after being overruled — to note the reversal, distinguish it, or in dissent. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedFord Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Hans v. State of Louisiana · United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · United States v. Shaw · Clark v. Barnard

Cited together with Edelman v. Jordan · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Hans v. State of Louisiana · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Quern v. Jordan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3,410 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the state is the real, substantial party in interest.”
    149 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.”
    47 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The Eleventh Amendment declares a policy and sets forth an explicit limitation on federal judicial power of such compelling force that this Court will consider the issue ... even though urged for the first time in this Court.”
    20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.