Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 324 ARK 13 - Villines v. Tucker

Villines v. Tucker’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Streight v. Ragland · Waterman v. Hawkins · Mears v. Arkansas State Hospital · MacKey v. McDonald · Mears v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We will continue to hold that statutes designed to meet the judicial needs of an area on a non-discriminatory basis are a part of a judicial system for the entire state and are not local or special within the meaning of Amendment 14, even though such statutes may apply only to individual counties, judicial districts or divisions within districts. . . . The limited application of the statute must be non-discriminatory and bear a reasonable relation to the subject matter of the legislation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.