Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

324 Ark. 453

921 S.W.2d 606

Moore v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 20, 1996

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1996-05-20

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“An incarcerated person desiring a photocopy of material on file with the clerk may write this court, remit the photocopying fee, and request that the copy be mailed to the prison. Id. All persons must bear the cost of photocopying unless this court has granted a motion for a copy of the requested material at public expense.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Muhammad v. Burl

Applies AR 25 § 25-19-101

Relies on United States v. Losing · Moore v. State · Austin v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-05-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 2020

16 state decisions

1201996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Petitioner Steve Sinatra Moore was found guilty by a jury of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise (CCE) and sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment. A fine of $5,000.00 was also imposed. We affirmed the judgment on direct appeal and reversed and remanded the case on cross-appeal, directing that the trial court reinstate the jury’s verdict and sentence for the five predicate offenses of the CCE conviction which it had set aside. Moore v. State, 321 Ark. 249, 903 S.W.2d 154 (1995).

¶2 Petitioner Moore, who contends that he is indigent, now seeks pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act a photocopy at public expense of the briefs filed on direct appeal. He gives no reason for the request.

¶3 We first note that Ark. Code Ann. § 25-19-101 et seq, the Freedom of Information Act, does not require a court to provide free-of-charge a copy of material on file with the court. A petitioner is not entitled to photocopying at public expense unless he demonstrates some compelling need for specific documentary evidence to support an allegation contained in a petition for post-conviction relief. See Austin v. State, 287 Ark. 256, 697 S.W.2d 914 (1985); see Chavez v. Sigler, 438 F.2d 890 (8th Cir.1971); see also United States v. Losing, 601 F.2d 351 (8th Cir. 1979). Indigency alone does not entide a petitioner to photocopying at public public expense. Washington v. State, 270 Ark. 840, 606 S.W.2d 365 (1980). The petitioner here has offered nothing to demonstrate that photocopies of material on file with this court should be provided to him at no cost.

¶4 It should be noted that when an appeal has been lodged in this court, the appeal transcript and other material filed on appeal remain permanendy on file with the clerk of the supreme court. Persons may review a transcript and other material in the clerk’s office and photocopy all or portions of it. An incarcerated person desiring a photocopy of an item on file may write this court and request that the copy be mailed to the prison. All persons, including prisoners, must bear the cost of photocopying. Austin v. State, supra.

¶5 Motion denied.

Dudley, J., not participating.
/324/ark/453 · .json · Public domain