Torsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusick’s Empirical Analysis
324 F.2d 1013 · 1963
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently May 2000 · most notably Patterson v. Hauck (1965), Berry v. Webb (1969)
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thurston v. Wulff · Benjamin Phillips and Paul S. Starcher v. Arthur W. Carlson · Searle v. Glarum · Senkus v. Johnston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the purpose of corroborative evidence is to confirm and to strengthen the testimony of the inventor.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““Corroborative evidence” is generally defined as additional evidence of a different character tending to prove the same point or fact. In other words, it is evidence tending to confirm and to strengthen or to show the truth or probability of truth of a witness’ testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(t)hat a party in an interference proceeding is rarely in a position to present evidence contradicting his opponent's testimony as to his acts of invention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.