Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 324 F.2d 173 - Peter v. United States

Peter v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

324 F.2d 173 · 1963

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 1965
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Estep v. United States · United States v. Macintosh · Burlington County Bridge Commission v. Driscoll · George v. United States · Berman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(j) Nothing contained in this title (sections 451-454 and 455-471 of this Appendix) shall be construed to require any person to be subject to combatant training and service in the armed forces of the United States who, by reason of religious training and belief, is conscientiously opposed to participation in war in any form. Religious training and belief in this connection means an individual’s belief in a relation to a Supreme Being involving duties superior to those arising from any human relation, but does not include essentially political, sociological, or philosophical views or a merely personal moral code.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.