Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

324 F.2d 286

Docket No. 161, Docket 28425.

Baxter v. Lancer Industries, Inc.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 8, 1963.

Decided Nov. 8, 1963.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1963-11-08

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1978

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1963-11-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*287Grossman & Grossman, New York City (Louis Grossman, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2Levy & Nevins, New York City (Saul S. Nevins, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

¶3Before WATERMAN, MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant’s complaint seeks recovery upon three separate causes of action, and he seeks review of an order entered in United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York denying his motion for summary judgment for the full amount of damages claimed in his first cause of action, or, in the alternative, for partial summary judgment thereon for a lesser amount.

¶6In open court on our own motion we dismiss the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

/324/f2d/286 · .json · Public domain