James L. Gianladis v. Gus S. Kass’s Empirical Analysis
324 F.2d 322 · 1963
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2001 · most notably Cooper v. Goldfarb (1998), Swain v. Mallory (1964)
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Townsend v. Smith · Henry St. Pierre v. Draper M. Harvey, Draper M. Harvey v. Henry St. Pierre · Collins v. Olsen · Thurston v. Wulff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The goal of corroboration here is simply to establish that the inventor actually produced the product and knew it would work, by proof that could not have been fabricated or falsified. All the evidence must be considered in determining whether or not the appellant has met such requirement.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage““As we understand the board's position, corroboration of the Gian-ladis reduction to practice would require that Packwood have tested the composition cosmetically and know of his own independent knowledge the chemical constituents thereof. We do not agree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Patterson v. Hauck
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.