Whaley v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
324 F.2d 356 · 1963
Citation profile
35 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably United States v. Moore (1973), United States v. Tonry (1979)
35 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 912 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Bolen v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“•x- -x- * Had the burden of proving criminal intent, and evidence of similar acts occurring reasonably near in time and reflecting intent similar to that charged in [the] ease [sub ju dice] was clearly relevant and material as throwing light upon and explaining the intent with which the [applicant] did the things charged against him in the indictment. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Grills v. Tennessee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.