Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

324 F.2d 710

Docket No. 7321.

Ellison v. United States

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Nov. 26, 1963.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1963-11-26

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Sanders v. United States · MacHibroda v. United States · Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Reddish

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1963-11-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently March 1982 · most notably Floyd v. United States (1966), Von Pickrell v. People (1967)

29 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

220196319701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1R. Sterling Ambler, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

¶2Jack R. Parr, Asst. U. S. Atty. (B. Andrew Potter, U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT, LEWIS, BREITENSTEIN, HILL, and SETH, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant is here for the third time seeking relief from a sentence imposed for narcotic violations. See Ellison v. United States, 10 Cir., 263 F.2d 395, and Ellison v. United States, 10 Cir., 283 F.2d 489, certiorari denied 365 U.S. 885, 81 S.Ct. 1038, 6 L.Ed.2d 196. The present proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is based on the previously unasserted claim that the appellant was mentally incompetent at the time of his plea of guilty. The trial court denied relief without a hearing.

¶6Whatever doubt may have existed after Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961, 76 S.Ct. 440, 100 L.Ed. 835, and Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 82 S.Ct. 510, 7 L.Ed.2d 473, over the right of a petitioner to claim in a § 2255 proceeding that a guilty plea was not made voluntarily and knowingly, was removed by Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148. When such a claim is presented it may not be denied without a hearing. In exercising its discretionary powers to direct the form and extent of the hearing the trial court is governed by the admonitions appearing in Machibroda, 368 U.S. at pp. 495-496, 82 S.Ct. 514, 7 L.Ed.2d 473, and in Sanders, 373 U.S. at pp. 20-23, 83 S.Ct. 1079-1081, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.

¶7Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the views here expressed.

/324/f2d/710 · .json · Public domain