Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

324 F.2d 711

Docket No. 7222.

Nipp v. United States

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1963-11-26

2 counsel of record

Relies on Sanders v. United States · MacHibroda v. United States · Egan v. American Airlines, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1963-11-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2015

15 federal appellate ·

80196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Robert N. Chaffin, U.S. Atty., District of Wyoming, and Leroy V. Amen, Asst. U.S. Atty., District of Wyoming, on the brief, for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PICKETT, LEWIS, BREITENSTEIN, HILL, and SETH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant pleaded guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. 2312. He seeks relief from the sentence imposed and asserts mental incompetence at the time of the guilty plea. The trial court treated his petition for coram nobis as an application under 28 U.S.C. 2255 and denied it without a hearing.

¶2

A claim of mental incompetence at the time of a guilty plea may be raised under 2255 and, when raised, may not be disposed of without a hearing. See Ellison v. United States, 10 Cir., 324 F.2d 710, decided today. As in Ellison we direct the attention of the trial court to the admonitions appearing in Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 495-496, 82 S.Ct. 510, 7 L.Ed.2d 473, and in Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 20-23, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.

¶3

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the views here expressed.

/324/f2d/711 · .json · Public domain