Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 324 F.2d 746 - Strachan Shipping Co. v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maalschappy, N.V.

Strachan Shipping Co. v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maalschappy, N.V.’s Empirical Analysis

324 F.2d 746 · 1963

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
December 2001
most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently December 2001 · most notably Todd Shipyards Corporation v. Turbine Service Inc Sa Turbine Service Inc (1982), Ruiz v. Shell Oil Co. (1969)

48 federal appellate · 1 district ·

38019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. · Paliaga v. Luckenbach Steamship Co. · 183 F. Supp. 779 - Gonzales v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company · Caswell v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maalschappy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “awarded to the shipowner (the defendant in the tort suit) that part of his attorneys' fees that were incurred in defending against the longshoreman's (plaintiff's) claim, but refused to award any attorneys' fees incurred in 'getting the stevedore into the case and establishing that the stevedore, rather than the shipowner, was responsible.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “fully concur(red) in the clear and logical opinion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.