Stone v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
324 F.2d 804 · 1963
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently April 1985 · most notably Baker v. United States (1968), Tillman v. United States (1969)
41 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3432
Relies on Skibs v. Otis McAlLister & Co. · Wagner v. United States · Hamer v. United States · Spivey v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The procedure to be followed in a voir dire examination of jurors in a criminal case is within the discretion of the trial court. (Citations omitted) The trial court did not permit the questioning of jurors with respect to propositions of law and its action was a proper one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“. if at the close of this case the evidence appears to be well balanced, or even, would you tend to favor one side or the other?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.