United States v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis
324 F.3d 1025 · 2003
Citation profile
25 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 3563 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583
Relies on United States v. Paul · United States v. Crandon · United States v. Zinn · United States v. Sofsky · United States v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[i]n cases where defendants used computers or the internet to commit crimes involving greater exploitation [than possessing child pornography], such restrictions have been upheld' ”) (quoting Fields, 324 F.3d at 1027 ); Freeman, 316 F.3d at 392 (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ppellate courts have overturned conditions seen as overly restrictive, especially in cases involving simple possession of child pornography.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.