Batten v. Gomez’s Empirical Analysis
324 F.3d 288 · 2003
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Armstrong v. Manzo · Lassiter v. Department of Social Services of Durham County North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To meet the requirements of due process, the state must afford notice and an opportunity to be heard `at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“trigger[ing] the procedural protections of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]e have been unable to find any authoritative cases considering analogous circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mellen v. Bunting
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.