Deutsch v. Turner Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
324 F.3d 692 · 2003
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2021 · most notably Alperin v. Vatican Bank (2005), Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena (2009)
25 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991)
Relies on Baker v. Carr · Hines v. Davidowitz · Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland · Crosby Secretary of Administration and Finance of Massachusetts v. National Foreign Trade Council · Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“foreign affairs field preemption may occur `even in the absence of a treaty or federal statute, because a state may violate the Constitution by establishing its own foreign policy.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“generally leads California courts to apply California law, and especially so where California’s statute would bar a claim.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The United States has already exercised its own exclusive authority to resolve the war, including claims arising out of it. It did not choose, however, to incorporate into that resolution a private right of action against our wartime enemies or their nationals. The United States resolved the war against Germany by becoming a party to a number of treaties and international agreements, beginning with the 1945 agreements at Yalta and Potsdam, in which the United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union agreed to extract reparations from Germany and .its nationals but did not include a private right of action against either.... Most recently, the Foundation Agreement of July 17, 2000, an executive agreement between the governments of Germany and the United States, provided a limited form of remedy for claimants such as Deutsch.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.