State v. Munoz’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Frazier v. Cupp · Riley v. State · State v. Ritter · Brown v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Thus, to overcome suppression, the [s]tate must show that (1) the suspect was not presented with the slightest hope of benefit, and (2) even if a hope of benefit was presented to the criminal defendant by the [s]tate, the suspect’s incriminating statements were not actually induced by this hope of benefit, such that his or her confession was rendered involuntary as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kaye v. the State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.