State v. Outen’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 306 Ga. App. 512 - Martinez v. State · 240 Ga. App. 725 - Wooten v. State · State v. Outen · Womack v. State · Kyles v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Georgia has adopted the federal rule recognizing that a superseding indictment filed after the expiration of the statute of limitation may relate back to a timely-filed original indictment if certain conditions are met. A superseding indictment brought after the statute of limitation has run is valid as long as (i) the original indictment is still pending; (ii) the original indictment was timely; and (iii) the superseding indictment does not broaden or substantially amend the original charges. 42”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lynch v. State“[a] new indictment usually refers to an indictment returned after the pending indictment has been dismissed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lynch v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.