Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 324 Ill. 560 - Shipley v. Shipley

Shipley v. Shipley’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
May 1960
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1960

7 state decisions

3019271930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gaunt v. Stevens · Engelbrecht v. Engelbrecht

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not necessary to use the exact words of the statute, in order to indicate an intention to create a joint tenancy. It is sufficient if the language employed be such as to clearly and explicitly show that the parties to the deed intended that the premises were to pass in joint tenancy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.