324 Ill. App. 3d 114 - Hiscott v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably 222 Ill. 2d 218 - Tri-G, Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & Weaver (2006), Lewis v. CITGO Petroleum Corp. (2009)
3 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 22 Ill. 2d 73 - Knierim v. Izzo · 161 Ill. 2d 374 - Doe v. Calumet City · 195 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Hall · 143 Ill. 2d 296 - Corgan v. Muehling · 157 Ill. 2d 304 - Gill v. Foster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Accordingly, the admission of [the expert’s] testimony cannot be said to have had no effect on the outcome of the trial. We believe that this error may have tipped the scales with regard to the jrny’s assignment of liability between the defendants.” Hiscott, 324 Ill. App. 3d at 124 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the expert is qualified by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education in a field that has `at least a modicum of reliability,' and if the testimony would aid the jury in understanding the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'lay an adequate foundation establishing that the information upon which the expert bases his opinion is reliable.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.