324 Ill. App. 3d 711 - People v. Marquez’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · 183 Ill. 2d 366 - People v. Coleman · 195 Ill. 2d 142 - People v. Edwards · 43 Ill. 2d 256 - The People v. Sailor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“did allege in his postconviction petition that an interpreter was necessary because he did not understand the English language. That allegation was raised by defendant in the context of defendant's claim that he did not voluntarily and intelligently waive his constitutional rights to trial by jury because no interpreter was provided.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.