State v. Stogsdill’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently June 1983 · most notably State v. McGee (1935), State v. Shawley (1933)
58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. City of Lamar · State v. Ruck · State v. Tippett · State v. Williams · State v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the order of proof is a matter largely in the discretion of the trial court, and if evidence, seemingly incompetent when offered, is later shown by developments in the case to be competent and material, we are not inclined to hold its premature introduction prejudicial error unless there is some showing that a party litigant was prejudiced by such untimely admission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Danforth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.