Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 324 N.C. 506 - State v. Hyleman

State v. Hyleman’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2016

15 state decisions

801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · State v. Arrington · State v. Hunter · State v. Campbell · State v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Each application for a search warrant must be made in writing upon oath or affirmation. All applications must contain: (1) The name and title of the applicant; and (2) A statement that there is probable cause to believe that items subject to seizure under G.S. 15A-242 may be found in or upon a designated or described place, vehicle, or person; and (3) Allegations of fact supporting the statement. The statements must be supported by one or more affidavits particularly setting forth the facts and circumstances establishing probable cause to believe that the items are in the places or in the possession of the individuals to be searched; and (4) A request that the court issue a search warrant directing a search for and the seizure of the items in question.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “THAT FROM THE MOVEMENT OF THE SUSPECTS DURING, AND BEFORE THE PURCHASE [OF COCAINE BY THE OFFICER], AND INFORMATION RECEIVED DURING THE PURCHASE, AND INFORMATION FROM TWO CONFIDENTIAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION AFTER THE PURCHASE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS REASON TO BELIEVE THAT THE U.S. CURRENCY [USED] . . . TO PURCHASE THE TWO OUNCES OF COCAINE, AND OTHER CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ARE AT THIS TIME LOCATED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LOCATION AND REQUEST RESPECTFULLY THAT A SEARCH WARRANT BE ISSUED.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “probable cause cannot be shown by conclusory affidavits stating only the belief of the affiant or an informer that probable cause exists to issue the warrant. Recital of some of the circumstances underlying this belief is essential.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.