State v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably State v. Robinson (1988), State v. Cruz (1983)
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Edwards v. Arizona · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Irvin v. Dowd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If * * * the jurors indicate their intention to set aside any preconceived notions, and demonstrate to the satisfaction of the trial judge that they are able to do so, [an appellate court] will not lightly substitute its own judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Butch, don’t worry ... Listen, let me tell you what happened. This guy — I told you he had backed off. He didn’t seem to want to do it. He called me up and he said, “Do you still want to do that?” and I said, “Yeah.” I said O.K. I come home and that’s what I found. He was planning an accident, it was supposed to be an accident. I was so God damn mad — and it was gruesome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howard v. Pung“is offered against a party and is * * * a statement by a co-conspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cruz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.