State v. Ahart’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2010
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Berger v. New York · Lewis v. United States · United States v. Oakes · United States v. Wright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[N]ot all warrantless entries gained by ruse are valid. Certainly, such an entry is not allowable if it is arbitrary.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State · Guidry v. State“An unlawful search taints all evidence obtained in the search or through leads uncovered by that search and bars its subsequent use.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Anderson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.