Mauri v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 6 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Taylor v. Metzger (1998), M.J. Paquet, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of Transportation (2002)
2 federal appellate · 6 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"One who intentionally intrudes, physically or otherwise, upon the solitude or seclusion of another, or his private affairs or concerns, is subject to liability to the other for invasion of his privacy, if the intrusion would be highly offensive to a reasonable man." 4”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lien“"[f]our separate theories comprise the 'umbrella' tort referred to as invasion of privacy: (1) intrusion upon seclusion; * (2) appropriation of another's name or likeness; (3) false light; and (4) publication of private facts."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lien“protects the right of a plaintiff to be let alone.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lien
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.