Madrid v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"If scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A]n expert may give an opinion on an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact so long as that opinion pertains to an issue of fact and the opinion is otherwise admissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“not objectionable because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.