Jinks v. Currie’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 73 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably Kuhns v. Brugger (1957), Boyd v. Smith (1953)
8 federal appellate · 73 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Zandras v. Moffett · Kniss v. Borough of Duquesne · Hayes Et Ux. v. Schomaker · Johnson v. American Reduction Co. · Stehle v. Jaeger Automatic Machine Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“So far as Mrs. Currie is concerned, she knew the intersecting road was there and when the truck pulled off to the side, it would have been prudent for her to have taken into account that it might be the intention of the driver to turn into the road and accordingly to have either stopped her car or slowed it down sufficiently to see just what the truck driver intended to do.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Mrs. Currie [the driver of the passing vehicle] knew about the intersecting road, having frequently passed it”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.