State v. Tucker’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 102 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably State v. Kelsey (1998), State v. Patterson (1997)
4 federal appellate · 102 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Wainwright v. Witt · Darden v. Wainwright · Woodson v. North Carolina · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Charges can be joined in the same indictment and tried together where they (1) arise out of a single chain of circumstances, (2) are proved by the same evidence, (3) are of the same general nature, and (4) no real right of the defendant has been prejudiced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Beekman“A motion for severance is addressed to the trial court and should not be disturbed unless an abuse of discretion is shown.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Beekman“[f]ailure to exhaust all of a defendant's peremptory strikes will preclude appellate review of juror qualification issues”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bixby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.