Washington v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2016
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Giglio v. United States · Aice v. State · State v. Williams · Davis v. State · Webb v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in his April 1992 order. [1] He asserted the PCR judge's 1992 order did not conform to his oral ruling at the PCR hearing. The PCR judge granted respondent's motion and issued an order amending his prior PCR order. In this amended order, the PCR judge stated that since the Supreme Court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Washington v. State“respondent was entitled to a new trial. It is from this order that the State sought and was granted a writ of certiorari. Respondent's second PCR application is successive. See S.C.Code Ann. § 17-27-90 (1976) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Washington v. State“Successive PCR applications are not favored, and the applicant has the burden of proving that the grounds raised in a successive application could not have been raised in a previous application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Washington v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.