Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

324 So. 2d 132

Ziers v. Purdy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 2, 1975

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1975-12-02

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1977

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1975-12-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petitioner has filed a petition for certiorari to review an administrative action by the respondents. He has also filed an application for supersedeas.

¶2The petition for writ of certiorari filed herein pursuant to § 120.68, Fla.Stat., fails to conform to the applicable Florida Appellate Rules in that it fails to file, along with the petition, a petitioner’s brief or a record of the proceedings before the appeals examiner as required by Rule 4.5, subd. c(l), F.A.R. Therefore, this court, pursuant to Rule 3.17, is empowered to dismiss the petition for failure to comply with the applicable Florida Appellate Rules.

¶3As to the application for superse-deas, § 120.68(3), Fla.Stat. provides a stay may be granted by the agency or by the reviewing court. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 5.5, F.A.R., it would be proper to deny this application without prejudice to apply to the administrative agency for su-persedeas. It is therefore

¶4Ordered and adjudged that the applica. tion for supersedeas is denied and the petition for certiorari is dismissed.

/324/so2d/132 · .json · Public domain