324 So. 2d 694 - Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2019
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · 44 So. 2d 664 - Mathews v. State · Wolfe v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in interviews with witnesses before trial, the examiner "must exercise the utmost care and caution to extract and not to inject information, and by all means to resist the temptation to influence or bias the testimony of the witnesses."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"The State prosecutor has an affirmative duty to correct what he knows to be false and to elicit the truth... . When ... it appeared that the prosecuting attorney did not intend to make a clear revelation ..., the trial court should have done so." Lee v. State, 324 So.2d 694, 697, 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“scrupulously avoid commenting on the evidence in a case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.