Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 324 U.S. 370 - Special Equipment Co. v. Coe

Special Equipment Co. v. Coe’s Empirical Analysis

324 U.S. 370 · 1945

Citation profile

141
cited by 141 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 16 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 141 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2023 · most notably Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co. (1961), Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co. (1945)

43 federal appellate · 16 district · 1 state decisions

390194519501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedSpecial Equipment Co. v. Coe (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Continental Paper Bag Company v. Eastern Paper Bag Company · Mercoid Corporation v. Mid-Continent Inv Co · Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co. · Motion Picture Patents Company v. Universal Film Manufacturing Company · Seymour v. Osborne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 141 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The patent grant is not of a right to the patentee to use the invention, for that he already possesses. It is a grant of the right to exclude others from using it * * *. By the very terms of the statute the grant is nothing more than a means of preventing others, except under license from the patentee, from appropriating his invention.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the exclusive right to make, use, and vend the invention or discovery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.