Gansky v. Hi-Tech Engineering’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. Pettey (1997), 2009 Ark. App. 763 - SSI, INC. v. Cates (2009)
58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Plante v. Tyson Foods, Inc. · Kuhn v. Majestic Hotel · 36 Ark. App. 190 - Gencorp Polymer Products v. Landers · 32 Ark. App. 168 - Curry v. Franklin Electric · 46 Ark. App. 232 - Arkansas Department of Correction v. Holybee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under these circumstances when the treating neurosurgeon has prescribed a functional capacity assessment and that was not done because Hi-Tech would not pay for it, we cannot agree with the Commission that additional medical treatment was not reasonably necessary or that the healing period had ended. We conclude that fair-minded persons, viewing the same evidence, could not decide otherwise.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.