King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2000
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Collins v. State · Watson v. State · Bunn v. State · King v. State · Midgett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have often held that a summary of the pleadings and the judgment appealed from are the bare essentials of an abstract. D. Hawkins, Inc. v. Schumacher, 322 Ark. 437 , 909 S.W.2d 640 (1995). This court does not presume error simply because an appeal is made. Mayo v. State, 324 Ark. 322 , 920 S.W.2d 843 (1996). It is the appellant’s burden to produce a record sufficient to demonstrate error, and the record on appeal is confined to that which is abstracted. Midgett v. State, 316 Ark. 553 , 873 S.W.2d 165 (1994).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]here is only one transcript, there are seven judges on this court, and it is impossible for each of the seven judges to examine the one transcript.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.