Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 ARK 334 - Pom, Inc. v. Taylor

Pom, Inc. v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mid-State Construction Co. v. Second Injury Fund · Kuhn v. Majestic Hotel · 41 Ark. App. 1 - Arkansas Highway & Transportation Department v. McWilliams · Bussell v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. · Buckeye Cotton Oil v. McCoy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the employee must have suffered a compensable injury at his present place of employment. Second, prior to that injury the employee must have had a permanent partial disability or impairment. Third, the disability or impairment must have combined with the recent compensable injury to produce the current disability status. [Emphasis in original.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.