Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 F.2d 160 - Ross v. Evans

Ross v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

325 F.2d 160 · 1963

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
December 1993
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 1993

17 federal appellate ·

601963197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Connell v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where, as here, the temporary restraining order has been entered by consent until the further order of the court, and no application has been made to dissolve the restraining order, and no orders have been made with respect to the restraining order except to continue it in force, it will not have lost its character as a non-appealable temporary restraining order and become converted into an appealable preliminary injunction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.