Munoz v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
325 F.2d 23 · 1963
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2008 · most notably Sabbath v. United States (1968), Dickey v. United States (1964)
18 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3109 · 26 U.S.C. § 7607
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · McDonald v. United States · Miller v. United States · Silverman v. United States · McGinnis v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may break open any outer or inner door or window of a house, or any part of a house, ... to execute a search warrant, if, after notice of his authority and purpose, he is refused admittance[.]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.