Castro v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
325 F.2d 72 · 1963
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 1992
14 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McAllister v. United States · Rogers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad · Glidden Company v. Zdanok Et Al. · Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc. · In Re Disbarment of Isserman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f the trial judge, in assaying the proofs, including questions of credibility and the drawing of inferences of fact, can be shown to have arrived at his conclusory findings by a misapplication of the law, we must set aside the findings thus made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“mixed questions of law and fact freely reviewable on appeal and not subject in the normal sense to the clearly erroneous limitation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.