Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 325 F.2d 768 - National Wrestling Alliance v. Myers

National Wrestling Alliance v. Myers’s Empirical Analysis

325 F.2d 768 · 1963

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
March 2004
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2004

11 federal appellate · 4 district ·

12019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. · Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. United States · United States v. Griffith · United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. · Bandy v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(T)he 'tendency of the courts is to find some way in which damages can be awarded where a wrong has been done.' Nevertheless, a plaintiff in such actions may not recover compensatory damages for loss of prospective profits based on mere speculation, surmise and conjecture.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.